| Año |
Palabras clave |
Título |
Autor |
| 2019 |
Self-plagiarism. Text recycling. Academic misconduct. |
The extent and causes of academic text recycling or ‘self-plagiarism’ |
Horbach, S.P.J.M.(Serge) & Halffman, W.(Willem). |
| 2019 |
Misconduct in medical research. Scientific stigmatization. |
Guilt by association: How scientific misconduct harms prior collaborators |
Katrin Hussingera. & Maikel Pellensb. |
| 2019 |
Scientific accountability. Scientific misconduct. |
Scientific misconduct and accountability in teams |
Hussinger, Katrin. & Pellens, Maikel. |
| 2019 |
Plagiarism. Academic integrity. |
Plagiarism detectors are a crutch, and a problem |
Debora Weber-Wulff. |
| 2018 |
Retractions. Scientific oversight. |
Rethinking retractions |
Jeffrey Brainard |
| 2018 |
Retractions. Scientific fraud. |
About these data |
Jeffrey Brainard |
| 2018 |
Professional ethics. Scientific misconduct. |
Nine pitfalls of research misconduct |
C. K. Gunsalus & Aaron D. Robinson. |
| 2018 |
Harassment. Scientific misconduct. |
Harassment should count as scientific misconduct |
Erika Marín-Spiotta |
| 2016 |
Plagiarism. Ethical responsibility. Scientific misconduct. |
Intellectual theft: pitfalls and consequences of plagiarism |
Traniello, James F. A. & Bakker, Theo C. M. |
| 2016 |
Authority. Misconduct, Priority journal (Caso de estudio). |
“How to survive as a whistle-blower”, en Nature Jobs 2016; 532:405 |
Michael Doran |
| 2016 |
Plagio. Ética académica. |
Plagio académico |
Catalina Inclán, Fausta Gantús, Javier Yankelevich y Héctor Vera |
| 2016 |
Investigación científica. Ética profesional.Arbitraje científico. |
“El plagio académico en la investigación científica: consideraciones desde la óptica del investigador de alto nivel”, en Perfiles Educativos 38(153):120-135 |
Mónica Hernández Islas |
| 2016 |
Lead Author. Scientific Legacy. Building Reputation. |
“Reaching out for scientific legacy: how to define authorship in academic publishing”, en The Science of Nature 2016;103(1-2):10 |
Sven Thatje |
| 2016 |
Plagiarism. Scientific ethics. Prevention of scientific misconduct. |
“Scientific Misconduct”, en Annual Review of Psychology 2016; 67:693-711 |
Charles Gross |
| 2015 |
Science-Moral and Ethical Aspects. Royal Society. High quality scientific research. |
“Unconscious bias” |
Uta Frith |
| 2014 |
Ethics of scientific authorship |
“Awarding the distinction of authorship on a scientific paper”, en Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science 2014;117( 3-4):270-272 |
Mark A. Schneegurt |
| 2014 |
Science-Moral and Ethical Aspects |
“Critical Issues in the Teaching of Responsible Writing”, en Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education 2014;15(2):103-107 |
Miguel Roig |
| 2014 |
Plagiarism |
“Editorial: Plagiarism is for losers”, en Software Testing Verification and Reliability 2015;25(1):1-3 |
Jeff Offutt |
| 2014 |
Science-Moral and Ethical Aspects |
“The integrity Mindset: an obligation to Ourselves and others”, en Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education 2014;15(2):120-123 |
C.K. Gunsalus |
| 2014 |
Science-Moral and Ethical Aspects. LGBT. |
“Pride in Science: The sciences can be a sanctuary for gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender individuals, but biases may still discourage many from coming out”, en Nature 2014;513(7518):297-300 |
Mitchell Waldrop |
| 2014 |
Science-Social Responsability |
“Socially Responsible Science is More than ‘Good Science’”, en Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education 2014;15(2):169-172 |
Stephanie J. Bird |
| 2014 |
Authorship. Code of Ethics. |
“What constitutes authorship? COPE Discussion Document” |
Cope Council |
| 2013 |
Plagiarism, Misrepresentation. Research Ethics. |
“Paraphrasing, plagiarism, and misrepresentation in scientific writing”, en Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science 2013;116(3-4):157-167 |
Mark E. Eberle |
| 2013 |
Plagiarism-Whistle Blowers |
“Responding to anonymus whistle blowers: COPE Discussion Document” |
Virginia Barbour |
| 2012 |
Scientifica Misconduct. Retractions. |
“Misconduct is the main cause of life-sciences retractions: opaque announcements in journals can hide fraud, study finds”, en Nature 2012; 490(7418):21 |
Zoë Corbyn |
| 2012 |
Authorship |
“Who"s on first?: when scientists collaborate on an experiment and a paper, it can be hard to decide who gets the credit and how much”, en Nature 2012;489:591-593 |
Amber Dance |
| 2011 |
Science-Moral and Ethical Aspects |
For the record: American Scientists Essays on Scientific Publication |
Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Society |
| 2011 |
Misconduct. Plagiarism. |
“How should editors respond to plagiarism? COPE Discussion Document” |
Elizabeth Wagner/COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) |
